![]() |
| Zorns Lemma, Hollis Frampton, 1970 (capture d'écran) |
University of Tokyo Center for Philosophy Lectures. Komaba Campus, 6 November 2012
Mesology
in the light of Yamanouchi Tokuryû’s Logos and lemma
by Augustin BERQUE
要約 – 風土論の中心概念(手懸り、風土性、通態化…)は山内得立が『ロゴスとレンマ』において提案したレンマの論理と比較される。特に、彼が四句分別における第 三のレンマを二重肯定ではなく、二重否定にしたことは風土論におけるr = S/P(PとしてのS)という現実の定義との類似が指摘される。要するに、人間の風土や生物の環世界の論理はレンマ的論理であろうと推定される。
Abstract – An analogy is drawn between the main concepts of mesology – affordance, mediance, trajection… – and the logic of lemma put forward by Yamanouchi Tokuryu in Logos and lemma. In particular, a comparison is made between the order in which he puts, in the tetralemma, binegation before biassertion, and the definition of the reality of a milieu as r = S/P (S taken as P). The logic of milieux (those of the living in general as well as those of the human in particular) would then be a lemmic.
キワード – 四句分別、通態化、手懸り、風土、風土性、山内得立 、レンマ。
Key words – Affordance, lemma, mediance, milieu, tetralemma, trajection, Yamanouchi.Abstract – An analogy is drawn between the main concepts of mesology – affordance, mediance, trajection… – and the logic of lemma put forward by Yamanouchi Tokuryu in Logos and lemma. In particular, a comparison is made between the order in which he puts, in the tetralemma, binegation before biassertion, and the definition of the reality of a milieu as r = S/P (S taken as P). The logic of milieux (those of the living in general as well as those of the human in particular) would then be a lemmic.
キワード – 四句分別、通態化、手懸り、風土、風土性、山内得立 、レンマ。











